Research Updates

News & Trial Summaries

Newest first. Each entry includes the trial topic, a plain-language summary, and an explicit limitations callout.

  1. #5 Canakinumab · anti-inflammatory CV risk reduction

    CANTOS

    Ridker et al., NEJM 2017

    Last verified: Jun 2026

    Summary

    CANTOS evaluated canakinumab, an interleukin-1β inhibitor, versus placebo in patients with prior myocardial infarction and elevated high-sensitivity CRP (≥2 mg/L) despite standard therapy, testing the inflammatory hypothesis of atherosclerosis independent of lipid lowering.

    Key takeaways: Canakinumab significantly reduced recurrent cardiovascular events without altering LDL cholesterol, providing landmark proof-of-concept that targeting inflammation directly can lower cardiovascular risk; it also reduced lung cancer incidence/mortality in exploratory analyses.

    Limitations

    The drug increased risk of fatal infection/sepsis, did not improve all-cause mortality, the effective dose for CV benefit was inconsistent across doses tested, and the cost and infection risk have limited canakinumab's clinical adoption for cardiovascular indications despite the conceptual breakthrough.
  2. #4 PCSK9 inhibition · primary & secondary prevention

    VESALIUS-CV

    Bohula et al., NEJM 2025; TIMI 66

    Last verified: Jun 2026

    Summary

    VESALIUS-CV tested evolocumab, a PCSK9 inhibitor, versus placebo added to optimized statin therapy in over 12,000 adults with atherosclerosis or high-risk diabetes but without a prior MI or stroke — extending PCSK9 inhibition into a broader primary-prevention-leaning population than earlier trials like FOURIER.

    Key takeaways: Evolocumab lowered LDL-C to a median in the 30–45 mg/dL range and reduced the primary composite endpoint (CHD death, MI, or ischemic stroke) by 25%, with consistent benefit including in the large diabetic subgroup and in patients without known significant atherosclerosis, supporting earlier and more aggressive LDL-lowering before a first major event.

    Limitations

    Median follow-up (~4.6–4.8 years) is relatively short to fully capture benefit in a lower-risk-than-secondary-prevention population; the population was predominantly white (93%) with median age 66, limiting generalizability; and as a non-statin add-on therapy, cost and access to PCSK9 inhibitors remain practical barriers to applying these findings broadly.
  3. #3 Intensive LDL-C targeting in ASCVD

    Ez-PAVE

    NEJM, April issue — "Intensive LDL Cholesterol Targeting in Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease"

    Last verified: Jun 2026

    Summary

    Ez-PAVE was the first head-to-head randomized trial directly comparing two LDL-C targets (rather than two drugs) — intensive (<55 mg/dL) versus conventional (<70 mg/dL) — in about 3,000 South Korean patients with established atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, using a pragmatic, open-label, treat-to-target design with statins, ezetimibe, and PCSK9 inhibitors as needed.

    Key takeaways: The intensive LDL-C target reduced the composite cardiovascular endpoint by roughly one-third (33% relative risk reduction) over three years compared with the conventional target, providing direct randomized support for guideline-recommended lower LDL-C goals in secondary prevention.

    Limitations

    The trial was open-label, and the primary endpoint was driven substantially by revascularization (a "softer," potentially physician-influenced outcome susceptible to performance bias in an unblinded design); the LDL-C separation between arms was modest (~10 mg/dL); there was no significant mortality benefit; and the trial was conducted in a single-country, exclusively East Asian population, raising questions about generalizability to other populations.
  4. #2 Metabolic / unrecognized hypercortisolism in diabetes

    CATALYST

    Buse et al., Diabetes Care 2025

    Last verified: Jun 2026

    Summary

    CATALYST (Part 1, the prevalence phase) was a prospective, two-part, multicenter study at 36 U.S. specialized diabetes centers designed to determine how common unrecognized hypercortisolism (Cushing's syndrome) is among people with "difficult-to-control" type 2 diabetes. 1,057 adults aged 18–80 with HbA1c 7.5–11.5% despite multiple standard-of-care therapies (≥3 glucose-lowering medications or insulin plus other agents) were screened with an overnight 1 mg dexamethasone suppression test (DST), with hypercortisolism defined as failure to suppress post-DST cortisol to ≤1.8 µg/dL.

    Key takeaways: Hypercortisolism was identified in 23.8% (about one in four) of participants — substantially higher than prior estimates. Prevalence rose to roughly one in three among patients on three or more antihypertensive medications, and about one-third of those with hypercortisolism had an adrenal abnormality on CT imaging. The findings suggest hypercortisolism is a meaningfully common, underrecognized contributor to poor glycemic control and may represent a treatable driver of "difficult-to-control" diabetes rather than just refractory disease itself.

    Limitations

    This was a cross-sectional study, so it cannot establish cause and effect. The dexamethasone suppression test is a screening tool with known false-positive potential and the participants did not undergo additional testing for hypercortisolism. Additionally the study population was selected from specialized diabetes centers (potentially enriching for more complex/referred patients). Lastly, CKD was not part of their exclusion criteria and this condition may result in secondary hypercortisolism.
  5. #1 High-dose EPA · triglyceride-rich CV risk reduction

    REDUCE-IT

    Bhatt et al., NEJM 2018

    Last verified: Jun 2026

    Summary

    REDUCE-IT tested high-dose icosapent ethyl (a purified EPA omega-3 fatty acid) versus mineral oil placebo in statin-treated patients with elevated triglycerides who had established cardiovascular disease or diabetes plus risk factors.

    Key takeaways: Icosapent ethyl reduced the primary composite cardiovascular endpoint (CV death, MI, stroke, revascularization, unstable angina) by about 25% relative risk reduction, one of the largest benefits seen with an add-on lipid therapy in the statin era, with benefit appearing to exceed what triglyceride lowering alone would predict.

    Limitations

    The mineral oil placebo modestly raised LDL and inflammatory markers in the comparator arm, raising concern that part of the benefit may reflect a placebo-related harm rather than a pure drug benefit; the trial also showed increased atrial fibrillation/flutter and bleeding events in the treatment arm, and results have not been fully replicated by other EPA/DHA combination trials (e.g., STRENGTH was negative).